4.6 Article

The Association of Changing Practice Settings on Maintenance of Certification Exam Outcomes: A Comparative Study of General Internists Over Time

期刊

ACADEMIC MEDICINE
卷 93, 期 5, 页码 756-762

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002028

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose To investigate how changing to or from solo practice settings relates to maintenance of certification (MOC) exam performance. Method The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of exam pass/fail outcomes for 7,112 physicians who successfully completed their initial MOC cycle from 2000 to 2004. Initial physician MOC practice characteristics records, demographic information, and exam performance were linked with exam pass/fail outcomes from their second MOC cycle from 2006 to 2014 ( 5,215 physicians after attrition). Exam pass/fail outcomes for physicians' second MOC cycle were compared among four groups: those who remained in group practice across both MOC cycles, those who changed from group to solo practice, those who changed from solo to group practice, and those who remained in solo practice across both MOC cycles. Results Physicians who changed from solo to group practice performed significantly better than those who remained in solo practice ( odds ratio [OR] = 1.67; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.11, 2.51; P=.027). Conversely, physicians changing from group to solo practice performed significantly worse than physicians staying in group practice ( OR = 0.60; 95% CI = 0.45, 0.80; P=.002). Meanwhile, physicians who changed from solo to group practice performed similarly to physicians remaining in group practice ( OR = 0.95; 95% CI = 0.67, 1.35; P = 0.76). Conclusions Changes in solo/group practice status were associated with second-cycle MOC exam performance. This study provides evidence that the context in which a physician practices may have an impact on their MOC exam performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据