4.6 Article

Do stressful conditions make adaptation difficult? Guppies in the oil-polluted environments of southern Trinidad

期刊

EVOLUTIONARY APPLICATIONS
卷 8, 期 9, 页码 854-870

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/eva.12289

关键词

adaptation; ecotoxicology; habitat degradation; natural selection and contemporary evolution

资金

  1. DAAD
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada
  3. Natural Environment Research Council [NBAF010003, NE/K004263/1, NE/G019355/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. NERC [NBAF010003, NE/G019355/1, NE/K004263/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ability of populations to rapidly adapt to new environments will determine their future in an increasingly human-modified world. Although meta-analyses do frequently uncover signatures of local adaptation, they also reveal many exceptions. We suggest that particular constraints on local adaptation might arise when organisms are exposed to novel stressors, such as anthropogenic pollution. To inform this possibility, we studied the extent to which guppies (Poecilia reticulata) show local adaptation to oil pollution in southern Trinidad. Neutral genetic markers revealed that paired populations in oil-polluted versus not-polluted habitats diverged independently in two different watersheds. Morphometrics revealed some divergence (particularly in head shape) between these environments, some of which was parallel between rivers. Reciprocal transplant experiments in nature, however, found little evidence of local adaptation based on survival and growth. Moreover, subsequent laboratory experiments showed that the two populations from oil-polluted sites showed only weak local adaptation even when compared to guppies from oil-free northern Trinidad. We conclude that guppies show little local adaptation to oil pollution, which might result from the challenges associated with adaptation to particularly stressful environments. It might also reflect genetic drift owing to small population sizes and/or high gene flow between environments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据