4.1 Article

Microenvironment Tumor Metabolic Interactions Highlighted by qMSI: Application to the Tryptophan-Kynurenine Pathway in Immuno-Oncology

期刊

SLAS DISCOVERY
卷 22, 期 10, 页码 1182-1192

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/2472555217712659

关键词

quantitative MSI; tryptophan; kynurenine; IDOI; biomarker

资金

  1. la MEL (Metropole Europeenne de Lille), la Region Nord Pas de Calais et BPI France [A1408004N]
  2. Wallonia Region

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inhibition of NK and effector T-cell functions and activation of regulatory cell populations are the main immunosuppressive effects of indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenaseI (IDOI). By converting tryptophan (Trp) into kynurenine (Kyn), IDOI is involved in the immune response homeostasis, and its dysregulated expression is described in immune-related pathologies, as tumors that hijack it to evade immune destruction. Thereby, IDOI inhibitors are being developed to stimulate antitumor immune responses. Existing and standard quantitation methods of IDOI substrate and metabolite(s) are based on the total level of Trp and its metabolites determined by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry analysis in human plasma, cerebrospinal fluid, and brain. Here, we describe the detection, localization, and absolute quantitation of Trp and Kyn by quantitative mass spectrometry imaging (qMSI) in transfected murine tumor models expressing various levels of IDOI. Myeloid, glycolysis metabolic signatures, and correlation between IDOI expression and Trp to Kyn conversion are also shown. High-definition IDOI and GCN2 immunostainings overlaid with Kyn molecular images underline the tumor metabolism and heterogeneity. The development of immunotherapies such as IDOI inhibitors requires a deep understanding of the immune system, the interplay of cancer cells, and biomarker characterization. Our data underline that qMSI allows the study of the spatial distribution and quantitation of endogenous immune metabolites for biology and pharmacology studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据