4.3 Article

Electronic properties of doped and defective NiO: A quantum Monte Carlo study

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW MATERIALS
卷 1, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.1.073603

关键词

-

资金

  1. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division
  2. Center for Predictive Simulation of Functional Materials
  3. Innovative and Novel Computational Impact on Theory and Experiment (INCITE)
  4. DOE Office of Science User Facility [DE-AC02-06CH11357, DE-AC05-00OR22725]
  5. Office of Science of the US Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

NiO is a canonical Mott (or charge-transfer) insulator and, as such, is notoriously difficult to describe using density functional theory (DFT)-based electronic structure methods. Doped Mott insulators such as NiO are of interest for various applications but rigorous theoretical descriptions are lacking. Here, we use quantum Monte Carlo methods, which very accurately include electron-electron interactions, to examine energetics, charge structures, and spin structures of NiO with various point defects, such as vacancies and substitutional doping with potassium. The formation energy of a potassium dopant is significantly lower than that of a Ni vacancy, making potassium an attractive monovalent dopant for NiO. We compare our results with DFT results that include an on-site Hubbard U (DFT + U) to account for correlations and find relatively large discrepancies for defect formation energies as well as for charge and spin redistributions in the presence of point defects. Beyond fitting to a single property, it is unlikely that single-parameter tuning of the DFT + U will be able to obtain accurate accounts of complex properties in these materials. Responses that depend in subtle and complex ways on ground-state properties, such as charge and spin densities, are likely to contain quantitative and qualitative errors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据