4.5 Article

Genome-wide interrogation advances resolution of recalcitrant groups in the tree of life

期刊

NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
卷 1, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41559-016-0020

关键词

-

资金

  1. George Washington University
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF) [DEB-147184, DEB-1541491, DEB-1457426, DEB-1541554, DEB-0315963, DEB-1023403, DEB-1350474]
  3. Smithsonian Peter Buck fellowship
  4. Natural History Museum (Smithsonian)
  5. Division Of Environmental Biology
  6. Direct For Biological Sciences [1457426] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Division Of Environmental Biology
  8. Direct For Biological Sciences [1541554] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Much progress has been achieved in disentangling evolutionary relationships among species in the tree of life, but some taxonomic groups remain difficult to resolve despite increasing availability of genome-scale data sets. Here we present a practical approach to studying ancient divergences in the face of high levels of conflict, based on explicit gene genealogy interrogation (GGI). We show its efficacy in resolving the controversial relationships within the largest freshwater fish radiation (Otophysi) based on newly generated DNA sequences for 1,051 loci from 225 species. Initial results using a suite of standard methodologies revealed conflicting phylogenetic signal, which supports ten alternative evolutionary histories among early otophysan lineages. By contrast, GGI revealed that the vast majority of gene genealogies supports a single tree topology grounded on morphology that was not obtained by previous molecular studies. We also reanalysed published data sets for exemplary groups with recalcitrant resolution to assess the power of this approach. GGI supports the notion that ctenophores are the earliest-branching animal lineage, and adds insight into relationships within clades of yeasts, birds and mammals. GGI opens up a promising avenue to account for incompatible signals in large data sets and to discern between estimation error and actual biological conflict explaining gene tree discordance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据