4.5 Article

Ecosystem functioning is enveloped by hydrometeorological variability

期刊

NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
卷 1, 期 9, 页码 1263-1270

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41559-017-0277-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Union via the Horizon project lBACP [640176]
  2. ETH Zurich Foundation through a Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) Early Postdoc [P2EZP2_162293]
  3. AsiaFlux office
  4. OzFlux office
  5. ChinaFlux office
  6. CDIAC
  7. Swiss National Science Foundation [P300P2_154543]
  8. Stavros Niarchos Foundation
  9. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [P300P2_154543] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Terrestrial ecosystem processes, and the associated vegetation carbon dynamics, respond differently to hydrometeorological variability across timescales, and so does our scientific understanding of the underlying mechanisms. Long-term variability of the terrestrial carbon cycle is not yet well constrained and the resulting climate-biosphere feedbacks are highly uncertain. Here we present a comprehensive overview of hydrometeorological and ecosystem variability from hourly to decadal timescales integrating multiple in situ and remote-sensing datasets characterizing extra-tropical forest sites. We find that ecosystem variability at all sites is confined within a hydrometeorological envelope across sites and timescales. Furthermore, ecosystem variability demonstrates long-term persistence, highlighting ecological memory and slow ecosystem recovery rates after disturbances. However, simulation results with state-of-the-art process-based models do not reflect this long-term persistent behaviour in ecosystem functioning. Accordingly, we develop a cross-time-scale stochastic framework that captures hydrometeorological and ecosystem variability. Our analysis offers a perspective for terrestrial ecosystem modelling and paves the way for new model-data integration opportunities in Earth system sciences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据