4.6 Article

Stimulation of 3D osteogenesis by mesenchymal stem cells using a nanovibrational bioreactor

期刊

NATURE BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
卷 1, 期 9, 页码 758-770

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41551-017-0127-4

关键词

-

资金

  1. BBSRC
  2. BBSRC/SFI
  3. EPSRC [BB/N012690/1, BB/P00220X/1, EP/N013905/1, EP/N012631/1, EP/P001114/1]
  4. Royal Society
  5. Find a Better Way
  6. SFI [11/SIRG/B2135, 13/RC/2073]
  7. STFC/BBSRC fellowship
  8. BBSRC [BB/N012690/1, BB/P00220X/1, BB/M028259/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. EPSRC [EP/N013905/1, EP/N012631/1, EP/P001114/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. STFC [ST/N005406/2, ST/L502509/1, Gravitational Waves] Funding Source: UKRI
  11. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/P00220X/1, BB/M028259/1, BB/N012690/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  12. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/P001114/1, EP/N012631/1, 1231536, EP/N013905/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  13. Science and Technology Facilities Council [Gravitational Waves, 1505872, ST/L502509/1, ST/N005406/2] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bone grafts are one of the most commonly transplanted tissues. However, autologous grafts are in short supply, and can be associated with pain and donor-site morbidity. The creation of tissue-engineered bone grafts could help to fulfil clinical demand and provide a crucial resource for drug screening. Here, we show that vibrations of nanoscale amplitude provided by a newly developed bioreactor can differentiate a potential autologous cell source, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), into mineralized tissue in 3D. We demonstrate that nanoscale mechanotransduction can stimulate osteogenesis independently of other environmental factors, such as matrix rigidity. We show this by generating mineralized matrix from MSCs seeded in collagen gels with stiffness an order of magnitude below the stiffness of gels needed to induce bone formation in vitro. Our approach is scalable and can be compatible with 3D scaffolds.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据