4.5 Article

The poisoning effects of phosphorus on CeO2-MoO3/TiO2 DeNOx catalysts: NH3-SCR activity and the formation of N2O

期刊

MOLECULAR CATALYSIS
卷 439, 期 -, 页码 15-24

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcat.2017.06.013

关键词

NH3-SCR; Phosphorus poisoning; CeO2-MoO3/TiO2; Deactivation; N-2 selectivity

资金

  1. National key research and development program [2016YFC0203900, 2016YFC0203901]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21307071, 21577173]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, the poisoning effects of phosphorus on CeO2-MoO3/TiO2 catalysts were investigated for their role in selective catalytic reduction of NO. by NH3 (NH3-SCR) applications. A series of P-poisoned CeO2-MoO3/TiO2 catalysts were prepared by the impregnation method. To investigate the deactivation mechanism of NH3-SCR, the samples were characterized by BET, NH3-TPD, XPS, in situ DRIFTS studies and NH3 catalytic oxidation. The activity tests showed that the DeNO(x). activity declined significantly after phosphorus loading, and a large quantity of N2O formed over the poisoned catalysts. It was found that the active metal sites at the surface were covered by phosphate (mainly cerous phosphate). The chemical deactivation effects of phosphorus on CeO2-MoO3/TiO2 mainly resulted from decreases in the number of active sites and in the adsorption capacity for NO. species. As the loading of phosphorus reached 1.32%, physical deactivation effects, e.g., severe changes in thermal stability and surface structure, also accounted for the decline in activity. The formation of substantial amounts of N2O after phosphorus loading, despite heavily poisoned Ce-sites, might be attributed to Mo-sites being mildly poisoned across the CeO2-MoO3/TiO2 catalyst. Thus, after phosphorus loading, the NH3-SCR occurred mainly on Mo-sites. Lastly, the increase in N-2 selectivity at high temperatures with the increasing phosphorus loadings was clarified by a kinetics study. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据