4.6 Article

EVEREST: PIXEL LEVEL DECORRELATION OF K2 LIGHT CURVES

期刊

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
卷 152, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/0004-6256/152/4/100

关键词

catalogs; planets and satellites: detection; techniques: photometric

资金

  1. NASA [NNX14AK26G, NNX13AF20G, NNX13AF62G]
  2. NASA Astrobiology Institute's Virtual Planetary Laboratory Lead Team, through NASA Astrobiology Institute [NNH12ZDA002C, NNA13AA93A]
  3. NSF
  4. NASA [681690, 475048, NNX13AF62G, NNX14AK26G] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present EPIC Variability Extraction and Removal for Exoplanet Science Targets (EVEREST), an open-source pipeline for removing instrumental noise from K2 light curves. EVEREST employs a variant of pixel level decorrelation to remove systematics introduced by the spacecraft's pointing error and a Gaussian process to capture astrophysical variability. We apply EVEREST to all K2 targets in campaigns 0-7, yielding light curves with precision comparable to that of the original Kepler mission for stars brighter than K-p approximate to 13, and within a factor of two of the Kepler precision for fainter targets. We perform cross-validation and transit injection and recovery tests to validate the pipeline, and compare our light curves to the other de-trended light curves available for download at the MAST High Level Science Products archive. We find that EVEREST achieves the highest average precision of any of these pipelines for unsaturated K2 stars. The improved precision of these light curves will aid in exoplanet detection and characterization, investigations of stellar variability, asteroseismology, and other photometric studies. The EVEREST pipeline can also easily be applied to future surveys, such as the TESS mission, to correct for instrumental systematics and enable the detection of low signal-to-noise transiting exoplanets. The EVEREST light curves and the source code used to generate them are freely available online.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据