4.5 Article

Environmentally induced changes in correlated responses to selection reveal variable pleiotropy across a complex genetic network

期刊

EVOLUTION
卷 69, 期 5, 页码 1128-1142

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/evo.12651

关键词

Experimental evolution; genetic architecture; G-matrix; natural selection; phenotypic plasticity; stress resistance

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DEB-1210922, DEB-1120417]
  2. Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellowship [AG032900]
  3. National Institutes of Health [AG022500, GM096008, RR032670]
  4. Ellison Medical Foundation fellowship
  5. Division Of Environmental Biology
  6. Direct For Biological Sciences [1120417] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Selection in novel environments can lead to a coordinated evolutionary response across a suite of characters. Environmental conditions can also potentially induce changes in the genetic architecture of complex traits, which in turn could alter the pattern of the multivariate response to selection. We describe a factorial selection experiment using the nematode Caenorhabditis remanei in which two different stress-related phenotypes (heat and oxidative stress resistance) were selected under three different environmental conditions. The pattern of covariation in the evolutionary response between phenotypes or across environments differed depending on the environment in which selection occurred, including asymmetrical responses to selection in some cases. These results indicate that variation in pleiotropy across the stress response network is highly sensitive to the external environment. Our findings highlight the complexity of the interaction between genes and environment that influences the ability of organisms to acclimate to novel environments. They also make clear the need to identify the underlying genetic basis of genetic correlations in order understand how patterns of pleiotropy are distributed across complex genetic networks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据