4.0 Review

On the Identification of Culturable Microorganisms for the Assessment of Biodiversity in Bioaerosols

期刊

ANNALS OF WORK EXPOSURES AND HEALTH
卷 62, 期 2, 页码 139-146

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/annweh/wxx096

关键词

bioaerosol; culturable microorganisms; culture-independent method; identification; microbiome

资金

  1. National Institute for National Research and Safety Institute for the Prevention of Occupational Accidents and Diseases (INRS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Annals of Work Exposures and Health recently published two interesting studies combining the use of culture and molecular methods. The method involves the cultivation of bioaerosol samples on agar media and the pick-up of grown colonies 16S rRNA gene amplification, subsequent cloning, sequencing, and identification of bacterial isolates through the assignment against known gene databases. The aim of the present paper is to discuss the contribution of the proposed method in regards with the already proposed approaches used for identification of cultured bacteria. It details the new proposed method and discusses its contribution to the existing culture-based identification methods. Such methods include macroscopic and microscopic observations, miniature biochemical tests (API (R) trips, VITEK 2 (R) etc.), chemical methods such as the Fatty Acid Methyl Ester (FAME) and the Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time off light (MALDI-TOF) analysis as well polymerase chain reaction (PCR) followed by sequencing. The proposed method supplements the panel of-existing biodiversity ones for cultivated bacteria, especially useful for infectious microorganisms, as well as culture-independent ones. As both culture-based and culture-independent methods could therefore be used for the characterization of the occupational environmental microbiome, further applications in other occupational environments as well as additional comparisons with both culture-based and culture-independent methods would complete its characterization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据