4.3 Article

Predictors of Infant Age at Enrollment in Early Infant Diagnosis Services in Kenya

期刊

AIDS AND BEHAVIOR
卷 20, 期 9, 页码 2141-2150

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10461-016-1404-z

关键词

HIV/AIDS; EID; PMTCT; Vertical prevention; Infants; Global health

资金

  1. National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development [R01HD076673]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite the importance of early detection to signal lifesaving treatment initiation for HIV+ infants, early infant diagnosis (EID) services have received considerably less attention than other aspects of prevention of mother to child transmission care. This study draws on baseline data from an on-going cluster randomized study of an intervention to improve EID services at six government hospitals across Kenya. Two logistic regressions examined potential predictors of on time (infant aecurrency sign6 weeks of age) vs. late (aeyen7 weeks) and on time versus very late (aeyen12 weeks) EID engagement among 756 mother-infant pairs. A quarter of the infants failed to get on time testing. Predictors of on time testing included being informed about EID by providers when pregnant, perceiving less HIV stigma, and mother's level of education. Predictors of very late testing (aeyen12 weeks of age) included not being informed about EID by providers when pregnant and living farther from services. Findings highlight the importance of ensuring that health care providers actively and repeatedly inform HIV+ mothers of the availability of EID services, reduce stigma by frequently communicating judgment free support, and assisting mothers in early planning for accessing EID services. Extra care should be focused on engaging mothers with less formal education who are at increased risk for seeking late EID testing. This study offers clear targets for improving services so that all HIV-exposed infants can be properly engaged in EID services, thus increasing the potential for the best possible outcomes for this vulnerable population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据