3.8 Article

Surface Impregnation of Glycine to Activated Carbon Adsorbents for Dry Capture of Carbon Dioxide

期刊

ASIAN JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
卷 10, 期 2, 页码 99-113

出版社

JAPAN SOC ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
DOI: 10.5572/ajae.2016.10.2.099

关键词

Carbon dioxide; MEA; Glycine; Activated carbon; Pre-treatment; Adsorption; Selectivity

资金

  1. Basic Science Research program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [NRF-2015R1D1A1A 01060182]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to improve the portability of basic absorbents monoethanolamine (MEA) and glycine (Gly), both were supported on microporous activated carbon (AC). Chemical modification by alkali-metal ion exchange (of Li, Na, K) was carried out on Gly-based absorbents. All supported absorbents were subjected to CO2 absorption capacity (pure CO2) and selectivity (indoor level) tests. Textural and chemical characterizations were carried out on test sorbents. All impregnation brought about significant reduction of specific surface area and microporosity of the adsorbent Depreciation in the textural properties was found to result to reduction in pure CO2 sorption. Contrarily, low-level CO2 removal capacity was enhanced as the absorbent dosage increases, resulting in supported 5 molar MEA in methanol solution. Adsorption capacities were improved from 0.016 and 0.8 in raw ACs to 1.065 mmol/g for MEA's. Surface chemistry via X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) of the supported sorbents showed the presence of amine, pyrrole and quaternary-N. In reducing sequence of potency, pyridine, amine and pyrrolic-N were noticed to contribute significantly to CO2 selective adsorption. Furthermore, the adsorption isotherm study confirms the presence of various SNGs heterogeneously distributed on AC. The adsorption mechanism of the present AC adsorbents favored Freundlich and Langmuir isotherm at lower and higher CO2 concentrations respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据