4.2 Article

Spatio-temporal synoptic variability of aerosol optical depth and cloud properties over the Central North region of India through MODIS collection V satellite sensors

期刊

INDIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS
卷 90, 期 6, 页码 613-625

出版社

INDIAN ASSOC CULTIVATION SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1007/s12648-015-0783-8

关键词

AOD 550 nm; MODIS; Cloud fraction; Cloud optical depth; t Test

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aerosol optical depth ( AOD) values at 550 nm derived from the Moderate-resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer ( MODIS) sensors have been analyzed in the present study. The retrieved MODIS satellite data have been used to investigate the temporal heterogeneity in columnar aerosol characteristics over the Central North region of India with a resolution of 1 degrees x 1 degrees grid in magnitude for the 10-year period of 2003-2012. Seasonal and inter-annual variations of AOD values are examined in light of regional synoptic climatic meteorology. On an annual basis, high annual average AOD values (>0.5) are found at Delhi (similar to 0.75 +/- 0.44), Kanpur (similar to 0.69 +/- 0.7) and Chandigarh (similar to 0.55 +/- 0.16), whereas low annual average AOD values (<0.5) are found at Raipur (similar to 0.38 +/- 0.046), Jaipur (similar to 0.38 +/- 0.096), Bhopal (similar to 0.33 +/- 0.087), Nainital (similar to 0.19 +/- 0.097) and Shimla (similar to 0.19 +/- 0.11). Highest annual mean increase in AOD (similar to 75 %) has been found over Jaipur, whereas lowest over Chandigarh (similar to 21 %) across Central North region of India during the study period of 2003-2012. We have investigated the relationship between Terra AOD values at 550 nm and other cloud parameters, namely cloud fraction, water vapor, cloud top temperature, cloud top pressure, cloud optical depth and cloud effective radius over this urban tropical zone of India so as to have a better understanding of aerosol-cloud interaction. A one-tailed distribution single paired Student's t test has also been applied to the Terra AOD values and cloud parameters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据