4.3 Article

Effects of different irrigation regimes on soil moisture availability evaluated by CSM-CERES-Maize model under semi-arid condition

期刊

ECOHYDROLOGY & HYDROBIOLOGY
卷 17, 期 3, 页码 207-216

出版社

INT CENTRE ECOLOGY, POLISH ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecohyd.2017.06.001

关键词

Crop models; DSSAT; Soil water module; Deficit irrigation; Over-irrigation

资金

  1. Iran National Science Foundation [88000841]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Crop models are useful tools for evaluation of management factors for any possible productivity improvement under water-deficit conditions. Such applications require an accurate simulation of the soil water balance. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of CSM-CERES-Maize model for simulating soil moisture under different irrigation levels of silage-maize. This experiment was conducted in growing seasons of 2003 and 2004. Treatments were four irrigation levels (two deficit-irrigation levels at 0.7 and 0.85 soil moisture depletion (SMD), a full irrigation (SMD) and an over-irrigation treatment (1.13 SMD), indicated by W1, W2, W3 and W4, respectively). Soil moisture was measured on a daily basis in different layers of the soil profile. In the first year, gravimetric sampling method and in the second year a neutron probe were used for measuring soil moisture. Simulated soil moisture was compared with measured field values for each individual soil layer. Results indicated that root mean square error (RMSE) of the model-predicted soil moisture for different treatments, depending on depth, was 0.8-13.6%. Systematic error and the index of agreement of the model in estimating total water in 60 cm soil profile was 0.8-2.00 cm. The greatest error in estimating soil moisture always happened for top layer of the soil profile. Based on the results, it can be concluded that CSM-CERES-Maize model is able to simulate soil moisture content for wide range of soil conditions and irrigation regimes. (C) 2017 European Regional Centre for Ecohydrology of the Polish Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier Sp. zo.o. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据