4.0 Article

Use of fluorescence quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the detection of Escherichia coli adhesion to pig intestinal epithelial cells

期刊

POLISH JOURNAL OF VETERINARY SCIENCES
卷 19, 期 3, 页码 619-625

出版社

POLSKA AKAD NAUK, POLISH ACAD SCIENCES, UNIV WARMIA & MAZURY OLSZTYN
DOI: 10.1515/pjvs-2016-0077

关键词

Adhesion; Escherichia coli; intestinal epithelial cells; pig; quantitative real-time PCR

资金

  1. National Natural Science Funds [31572360, 31372285]
  2. Genetically Modified Organisms Technology Major Project [2014ZX08006-001B]
  3. Science and Technology Supporting Project of Jiangsu Province [BE2015329, BE2014357]
  4. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An efficient and accurate method to test Escherichia coli (E. coli) adhesion to intestinal epithelial cells will contribute to the study of bacterial pathogenesis and the function of genes that encode receptors related to adhesion. This study used the quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) method. qPCR primers were designed from the PILIN gene of E. coli F18ab, F18ac, and K88ac, and the pig beta-ACTIN gene. Total deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) from E. coli and intestinal epithelial cells (IPEC-J2 cells) were used as templates for qPCR. The 2(Delta Delta Ct) formula was used to calculate the relative number of bacteria in cultures of different areas. We found that the relative numbers of F18ab, F18ac, and K88ac that adhered to IPEC-J2 cells did not differ significantly in 6-, 12-, and 24-well culture plates. This finding indicated that there was no relationship between the relative adhesion number of E. coli and the area of cells, so the method of qPCR could accurately test the relative number of E. coli. This study provided a convenient and reliable testing method for experiments involving E. coli adhesion, and also provided innovative ideas for similar detection methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据