4.4 Article

Detection of novel syntrophic acetate-oxidizing bacteria from biogas processes by continuous acetate enrichment approaches

期刊

MICROBIAL BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 11, 期 4, 页码 680-693

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1751-7915.13035

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning (Formas) [2012-808]
  2. Swedish Energy Agency [2014-000725]
  3. Vastra Gotaland Regionen [VGR 93-2014]
  4. Formas [942-2015-1008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To enrich syntrophic acetate-oxidizing bacteria (SAOB), duplicate chemostats were inoculated with sludge from syntrophic acetate oxidation (SAO)-dominated systems and continuously supplied with acetate (0.4 or 7.5gl(-1)) at high-ammonia levels. The chemostats were operated under mesophilic (37 degrees C) or thermophilic (52 degrees C) temperature for about six hydraulic retention times (HRT 28days) and were sampled over time. Irrespective of temperature, a methane content of 64-69% and effluent acetate level of 0.4-1.0gl(-1) were recorded in chemostats fed high acetate. Low methane production in the low-acetate chemostats indicated that the substrate supply was below the threshold for methanization of acetate via SAO. Novel representatives within the family Clostridiales and genus Syntrophaceticus (class Clostridia) were identified to represent putative SAOB candidates in mesophilic and thermophilic conditions respectively. Known SAOB persisted at low relative abundance in all chemostats. The hydrogenotrophic methanogens Methanoculleus bourgensis (mesophilic) and Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus (thermophilic) dominated archaeal communities in the high-acetate chemostats. In line with the restricted methane production in the low-acetate chemostats, methanogens persisted at considerably lower abundance in these chemostats. These findings strongly indicate involvement in SAO and tolerance to high ammonia levels of the species identified here, and have implications for understanding community function in stressed anaerobic processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据