4.6 Article

STAT3 but Not HIF-1 Is Important in Mediating Hypoxia-Induced Chemoresistance in MDA-MB-231, a Triple Negative Breast Cancer Cell Line

期刊

CANCERS
卷 9, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cancers9100137

关键词

hypoxia-induced chemoresistance; HIF-1; STAT3; cisplatin; cancer stemness

类别

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  2. Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation (CBCF)
  3. Women and Children's Health Research Institute (WCHRI)
  4. Alberta Cancer Foundation (ACF)
  5. CBCF

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hypoxia-induced chemoresistance (HICR) is a well-recognized phenomenon, and in many experimental models, hypoxia inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) is believed to be a key player. We aimed to better understand the mechanism underlying HICR in a triple negative breast cancer cell line, MDA-MB-231, with a focus on the role of HIF-1. In this context, the effect of hypoxia on the sensitivity of MDA-MB-231 cells to cisplatin and their stem-like features was evaluated and the role of HIF-1 in both phenomena was assessed. Our results showed that hypoxia significantly increased MDA-MB-231 resistance to cisplatin. Correlating with this, intracellular uptake of cisplatin was significantly reduced under hypoxia. Furthermore, the stem-like features of MDA-MB-231 cells increased as evidenced by the significant increases in the expression of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) drug transporters, the proportion of CD44(+)/CD24(-) cells, clonogenic survival and cisplatin chemoresistance. Under hypoxia, both the protein level and DNA binding of HIF-1 was dramatically increased. Surprisingly, siRNA knockdown of HIF-1 did not result in an appreciable change to HICR. Instead, signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) activation was found to be important. STAT3 activation may confer HICR by upregulating ABC transporters, particularly ABCC2 and ABCC6. This study has demonstrated that, in MDA-MB-231 cells, STAT3 rather than HIF-1 is important in mediating HICR to cisplatin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据