4.6 Review

Diagnosis and Management of Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia Mayo Stratification of Macroglobulinemia and Risk-Adapted Therapy (mSMART) Guidelines 2016

期刊

JAMA ONCOLOGY
卷 3, 期 9, 页码 1257-1265

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5763

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Takeda
  2. Onyx
  3. Celgene
  4. Sanofi
  5. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  6. Celldex
  7. Merck
  8. Affimed
  9. Seattle Genetics
  10. Genzyme
  11. Bayer
  12. Lilly
  13. Binding Site
  14. Novartis
  15. Millennium
  16. Amgen
  17. AbbVie
  18. Janssen
  19. Spectrum Pharmaceuticals
  20. Acerta Pharma
  21. Alnylam pharmaceutical
  22. Ionis pharmaceutical
  23. Millenium
  24. Pfizer
  25. Jannsen
  26. Alnylam
  27. Pharmacyclics, Inc.
  28. Karyopharm
  29. Prothena
  30. Constellation Pharmaceuticals
  31. Sanofi-Aventis
  32. Mundipharma
  33. Ionis Pharmaceuticals

向作者/读者索取更多资源

IMPORTANCE Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia (WM), an IgM-associated lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma, has witnessed several practice-altering advances in recent years. With availability of a wider array of therapies, the management strategies have become increasingly complex. Our multidisciplinary team appraised studies published or presented up to December 2015 to provide consensus recommendations for a risk-adapted approach to WM, using a grading system. OBSERVATIONS Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia remains a rare, incurable cancer, with a heterogeneous disease course. The major classes of effective agents in WM include monoclonal antibodies, alkylating agents, purine analogs, proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors. However, the highest-quality evidence from rigorously conducted randomized clinical trials remains scant. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Recognizing the paucity of data, we advocate participation in clinical trials, if available, at every stage of WM. Specific indications exist for initiation of therapy. Outside clinical trials, based on the synthesis of available evidence, we recommend bendamustine-rituximab as primary therapy for bulky disease, profound hematologic compromise, or constitutional symptoms attributable to WM. Dexamethasone-rituximab-cyclophosphamide is an alternative, particularly for nonbulky WM. Routine rituximab maintenance should be avoided. Plasma exchange should be promptly initiated before cytoreduction for hyperviscosity-related symptoms. Stem cell harvest for future use may be considered in first remission for patients 70 years or younger who are potential candidates for autologous stem cell transplantation. At relapse, retreatment with the original therapy is reasonable in patients with prior durable responses (time to next therapy >= 3 years) and good tolerability to previous regimen. Ibrutinib is efficacious in patients with relapsed or refractory disease harboring MYD88 L265P mutation. In the absence of neuropathy, a bortezomib-rituximab-based option is reasonable for relapsed or refractory disease. In select patients with chemosensitive disease, autologous stem cell transplantation should be considered at first or second relapse. Everolimus and purine analogs are suitable options for refractory or multiply relapsed WM. Our recommendations are periodically updated as new, clinically relevant information emerges.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据