4.8 Review

Design and synthesis of polyoxometalate-framework materials from cluster precursors

期刊

NATURE REVIEWS MATERIALS
卷 2, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.54

关键词

-

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/H024107/1, EP/I033459/1, EP/J00135X/1, EP/J015156/1, EP/K021966/1, EP/K023004/1, EP/K038885/1, EP/L015668/1, EP/L023652/1]
  2. European Research Council (ERC) [670467]
  3. EPSRC [EP/H024107/1, EP/K021966/1, EP/K038885/1, EP/L023652/1, EP/J015156/1, EP/C542819/1, EP/L015668/1, EP/K023004/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K038885/1, EP/C542819/1, EP/K021966/1, EP/L015668/1, EP/L023652/1, EP/K023004/1, EP/H024107/1, EP/J015156/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inorganic oxide materials are used in semiconductor electronics, ion exchange, catalysis, coatings, gas sensors and as separation materials. Although their synthesis is well understood, the scope for new materials is reduced because of the stability limits imposed by high-temperature processing and top-down synthetic approaches. In this Review, we describe the derivatization of polyoxometalate (POM) clusters, which enables their assembly into a range of frameworks by use of organic or inorganic linkers. Additionally, bottom-up synthetic approaches can be used to make metal oxide framework materials, and the features of the molecular POM precursors are retained in these structures. Highly robust all-inorganic frameworks can be made using metal-ion linkers, which combine molecular synthetic control without the need for organic components. The resulting frameworks have high stability, and high catalytic, photochemical and electrochemical activity. Conceptually, these inorganic oxide materials bridge the gap between zeolites and metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) and establish a new class of all-inorganic POM frameworks that can be designed using topological and reactivity principles similar to MOFs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据