4.5 Article

Structure of the MacAB-TolC ABC-type tripartite multidrug efflux pump

期刊

NATURE MICROBIOLOGY
卷 2, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.70

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust
  2. Human Frontiers Science Program
  3. Marie Curie International Outgoing Fellowship
  4. UK Medical Research Council [MC_UP_A025_1013]
  5. Wellcome Trust ISSF award [WT097818MF]
  6. Scottish Universities' Physics Alliance
  7. MRC Mitochondrial Biology Unit [U105663141]
  8. Herchel-Smith Scholarship
  9. BBSRC [BB/K017713/1, BB/R00224X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. MRC [MC_UP_A025_1013, MC_PC_14116] Funding Source: UKRI
  11. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/R00224X/1, BB/K017713/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  12. Medical Research Council [MC_UP_A025_1013, MC_PC_14116] Funding Source: researchfish
  13. Direct For Biological Sciences
  14. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [1338135] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The MacA-MacB-TolC assembly of Escherichia coli is a transmembrane machine that spans the cell envelope and actively extrudes substrates, including macrolide antibiotics and polypeptide virulence factors. These transport processes are energized by the ATPase MacB, a member of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) superfamily. We present an electron cryomicroscopy structure of the ABC-type tripartite assembly at near-atomic resolution. A hexamer of the periplasmic protein MacA bridges between a TolC trimer in the outer membrane and a MacB dimer in the inner membrane, generating a quaternary structure with a central channel for substrate translocation. A gating ring found in MacA is proposed to act as a one-way valve in substrate transport. The MacB structure features an atypical transmembrane domain with a closely packed dimer interface and a periplasmic opening that is the likely portal for substrate entry from the periplasm, with subsequent displacement through an allosteric transport mechanism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据