4.5 Article

Mefloquine targets the Plasmodium falciparum 80S ribosome to inhibit protein synthesis

期刊

NATURE MICROBIOLOGY
卷 2, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.31

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) Project Grant [APP1024678]
  2. Australian Cancer Research Foundation
  3. Human Frontier Science Program (HFSP)Young Investigator Program Grant [RGY0071/2011]
  4. UK Medical Research Council [MC_UPA0251013, MC_U105184332]
  5. OzEMalaR
  6. EU FP7 Marie Curie Postdoctoral Fellowship
  7. Wellcome Trust [WT096570, 100993/Z/13/Z, 105686]
  8. Australian Research Council (ARC) [FT100100112]
  9. MRC [MC_UP_A025_1013] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. Medical Research Council [MC_UP_A025_1013] Funding Source: researchfish
  11. Wellcome Trust [100993/Z/13/Z] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Malaria control is heavily dependent on chemotherapeutic agents for disease prevention and drug treatment. Defining the mechanism of action for licensed drugs, for which no target is characterized, is critical to the development of their second-generation derivatives to improve drug potency towards inhibition of their molecular targets. Mefloquine is a widely used antimalarial without a known mode of action. Here, we demonstrate that mefloquine is a protein synthesis inhibitor. We solved a 3.2 angstrom cryo-electron microscopy structure of the Plasmodium falciparum 80S ribosome with the (+)-mefloquine enantiomer bound to the ribosome GTPase-associated centre. Mutagenesis of mefloquine-binding residues generates parasites with increased resistance, confirming the parasite-killing mechanism. Furthermore, structure-guided derivatives with an altered piperidine group, predicted to improve binding, show enhanced parasiticidal effect. These data reveal one possible mode of action for mefloquine and demonstrate the vast potential of cryo-electron microscopy to guide the development of mefloquine derivatives to inhibit parasite protein synthesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据