4.5 Article

Global analysis of biosynthetic gene clusters reveals vast potential of secondary metabolite production in Penicillium species

期刊

NATURE MICROBIOLOGY
卷 2, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.44

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Commission Marie Curie Initial Training Network Quantfung (FP7-People-ITN) [607332]
  2. Novo Nordisk Foundation
  3. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  4. UPPMAX [b2014081]
  5. National Bioinformatics Infrastructure Sweden (NBIS)
  6. NNF Center for Biosustainability [Yeast Cell Factories] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Novo Nordisk Fonden [NNF10CC1016517] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Filamentous fungi produce a wide range of bioactive compounds with important pharmaceutical applications, such as antibiotic penicillins and cholesterol-lowering statins. However, less attention has been paid to fungal secondary metabolites compared to those from bacteria. In this study, we sequenced the genomes of 9 Penicillium species and, together with 15 published genomes, we investigated the secondary metabolism of Penicillium and identified an immense, unexploited potential for producing secondary metabolites by this genus. A total of 1,317 putative biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) were identified, and polyketide synthase and non-ribosomal peptide synthetase based BGCs were grouped into gene cluster families and mapped to known pathways. The grouping of BGCs allowed us to study the evolutionary trajectory of pathways based on 6-methylsalicylic acid (6-MSA) synthases. Finally, we cross-referenced the predicted pathways with published data on the production of secondary metabolites and experimentally validated the production of antibiotic yanuthones in Penicillia and identified a previously undescribed compound from the yanuthone pathway. This study is the first genus-wide analysis of the genomic diversity of Penicillia and highlights the potential of these species as a source of new antibiotics and other pharmaceuticals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据