4.6 Article

Raising the one-sun conversion efficiency of III-V/Si solar cells to 32.8% for two junctions and 35.9% for three junctions

期刊

NATURE ENERGY
卷 2, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/nenergy.2017.144

关键词

-

资金

  1. Marie Sklodowska-Curie Individual Fellowship from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon research and innovation programme [706744]
  2. DOE through EERE [SETP DE-EE00030299, DE-AC36-08GO28308]
  3. Laboratory-Directed Research and Development funds
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation (Nanotera programme)
  5. Swiss National Science Foundation (PNR70 programme)
  6. European Union's Horizon research and innovation programme [641864]
  7. H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [641864] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme
  8. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [706744] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Today's dominant photovoltaic technologies rely on single-junction devices, which are approaching their practical efficiency limit of 25-27%. Therefore, researchers are increasingly turning to multi-junction devices, which consist of two or more stacked subcells, each absorbing a different part of the solar spectrum. Here, we show that dual-junction III-V//Si devices with mechanically stacked, independently operated III-V and Si cells reach cumulative one-sun efficiencies up to 32.8%. Efficiencies up to 35.9% were achieved when combining a GaInP/GaAs dual-junction cell with a Si single-junction cell. These efficiencies exceed both the theoretical 29.4% efficiency limit of conventional Si technology and the efficiency of the record III-V dual-junction device (32.6%), highlighting the potential of Si-based multi-junction solar cells. However, techno-economic analysis reveals an order-of-magnitude disparity between the costs for III-V//Si tandem cells and conventional Si solar cells, which can be reduced if research advances in low-cost III-V growth techniques and new substrate materials are successful.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据