4.7 Article

VERY HIGH ENERGY OBSERVATIONS OF THE BINARIES V 404 CYG AND 4U 0115+634 DURING GIANT X-RAY OUTBURSTS

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 831, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/0004-637X/831/1/113

关键词

acceleration of particles; binaries: general; gamma rays: general; stars: individual (V 404 Cyg, 4U 0115+634)

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science
  2. Smithsonian Institution
  3. NSERC in Canada
  4. U.S. National Science Foundation
  5. Division Of Physics
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1307311, 1307443, 1352567, 1607491, 1402740, 1505811, 1407326] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Division Of Physics
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1403336, 1607128] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transient X-ray binaries produce major outbursts in which the X-ray flux can increase over the quiescent level by factors as large as 10(7). The low-mass X-ray binary V 404 Cyg and the high-mass system 4U 0115+634 underwent such major outbursts in 2015 June and October, respectively. We present here observations at energies above hundreds of GeV with the VERITAS observatory taken during some of the brightest X-ray activity ever observed from these systems. No gamma-ray emission has been detected by VERITAS in 2.5 hr of observations of the microquasar V 404 Cyg from 2015, June 20-21. The upper flux limits derived from these observations on the gamma-ray flux above 200 GeV of F < 4.4 x 10(-12) cm(-2) s(-1) correspond to a tiny fraction (about 10(-6)) of the Eddington luminosity of the system, in stark contrast to that seen in the X-ray band. No gamma-rays have been detected during observations of 4U 0115+634 in the period of major X-ray activity in 2015 October. The flux upper limit derived from our observations is F < 2.1 x 10(-12) cm(-2) s(-1) for gamma-rays above 300 GeV, setting an upper limit on the ratio of gamma-ray to X-ray luminosity of less than 4%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据