3.9 Article

Historical mitochondrial diversity in African leopards (Panthera pardus) revealed by archival museum specimens

期刊

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA PART A
卷 29, 期 3, 页码 455-473

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/24701394.2017.1307973

关键词

Panthera pardus; African leopard; museum collections; genetic diversity; phylogeography

资金

  1. Fordham University
  2. American Museum of Natural History
  3. Wildlife Conservation Society

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Once found throughout Africa and Eurasia,the leopard (Panthera pardus) was recently uplisted from Near Threatened to Vulnerable by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN). Historically, more than 50% of the leopard's global range occurred in continental Africa, yet sampling from this part of the species' distribution is only sparsely represented in prior studies examining patterns of genetic variation at the continental or global level. Broad sampling to determine baseline pat terns of genetic variation throughout the leopard's historical distribution is important, as these measures are currently used by the IUCN to direct conservation priorities and management plans. By including data from 182 historical museum specimens, faecal samples from ongoing field surveys, and published sequences representing sub-Saharan Africa, we identify previously unrecognized genetic diversity in African leopards. Our mtDNA data indicates high levels of divergence among regional populations and strongly differentiated lineages in West Africa on par with recent studies of other large verebrates. We provide a reference benchmark of genetic diversity in African leopards against which future monitoring can be compared. These findings emphasize the utility of historical museum collections in understanding the processes that shape present biodiversity. Additionally, we suggest future research to clarify African leopard taxonomy and to differentiate between delineated units requiring monitoring or conservation action.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据