4.1 Article

Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgical Techniques in the Treatment of Spinal Metastases

期刊

CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY
卷 30, 期 8, 页码 E1082-E1087

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000460

关键词

minimally invasive spine surgery; minimally invasive spine stabilization; percutaneous pedicle screw; metastatic spinal tumor; palliative surgery; less invasive; short life expectancy

资金

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K10457] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Study Design: A retrospective cohort study. Objective: This study was conducted to assess the invasiveness, efficacy, and safety of minimally invasive spine stabilization (MISt) for metastatic spinal tumor patients with short life expectancy. Summary of Background Data: Conventional open surgery for metastatic spinal tumors has the disadvantages of significant blood loss, potential infection, damage to back muscles, and extended hospital stays. The minimally invasive spine surgery has changed the treatment of metastatic spinal tumors radically and fundamentally. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data from 50 consecutive patients registered with the Keio Spine Research Group (KSRG) who underwent posterior palliative surgery for metastatic spinal tumors from January 2009 to June 2015. Of these, 25 patients underwent MISt surgery (M group), and 25 underwent conventional open surgery (C group). The patients were assessed by demographic data, surgical invasiveness, complications, pain improvement, and neurological recovery. Results: The 2 groups did not differ significantly in baseline characteristics. The M group had significantly less blood loss (M, 340.1 mL; C, 714.3 mL; P = 0.005), less postoperative drainage (M, 136.0 mL; C, 627.0 mL; P < 0.001), lower rates of red blood cell transfusion (M, 3 cases; C, 10 cases; P = 0.029), and a shorter postoperative period of bed rest (M, 2.0 d; C, 3.6 d; P < 0.001), compared with the C group. The perioperative complication rates were significantly lower (P = 0.012) in the M group (3 patients, 12%) than in the C group (11 patients, 44%). Neurological deficits and pain improved significantly and comparably in the 2 groups after surgery. Conclusions: MISt is a less invasive and effective alternative surgery to conventional open surgery for metastatic spinal tumors. MISt should be considered as a valid option for the treatment of metastatic spinal tumor patients with a short life expectancy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据