4.7 Article

Exploring consumers' intention to accept smartwatch

期刊

COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR
卷 64, 期 -, 页码 383-392

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.005

关键词

Smartwatch; Wearable technology; Innovation diffusion theory (IDT); Technology acceptance model (TAM); Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT); Perceived enjoyment

资金

  1. Program for Professor of Special Appointment (Eastern Scholar) at Shanghai Institutions of Higher Learning [2012-72]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the growing smartwatch market over the past few years, smartwatch acceptance in consumer markets has become an important topic for both researchers and designers. Identification of factors that influence consumers to accept a smartwatch can improve user-centered design. This study explores the intentions of using a smartwatch from the consumer perspective, combining innovation diffusion theory (IDT), the technology acceptance model (TAM), the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT), and perceived enjoyment. It presents an integrated method empirically tested with data from 212 participants in Taiwan. Partial lease squares (PLS) were used for models and hypotheses tests. We find several interesting results greatly different from previous studies: (1) Attitude, often identified as a weak mediator, is significant; (2) Ease of use was not significant, which implies that it should be the basic specification of smartwatches; (3) Gender has no significant effect on acceptance of smartwatches; and (4) Individuals 35-54 years old exhibit a significant demand for enjoyment in their use of smartwatch. This study contributes to the technology acceptance research field, and identifies the characteristics that influence smartwatch acceptance. Our methods and results should benefit both academics and managers with useful suggestions for research directions and product strategies. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据