4.6 Article

In situ Visualization of State-of-Charge Heterogeneity within a LiCoO2 Particle that Evolves upon Cycling at Different Rates

期刊

ACS ENERGY LETTERS
卷 2, 期 5, 页码 1240-1245

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00263

关键词

-

资金

  1. DOE Office of Science [DE-SC0012704]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2016YFB0100300]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy, the Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Office of Vehicle Technologies through Advanced Battery Material Research (BMR) program (Battery500 consortium) [DE-SC0012704]
  4. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFA0400900]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11535015, U1632110]
  6. Open Research Foundation of State Key Lab. of Digital Manufacturing Equipment & Technology in Huazhong University of Science Technology
  7. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-76SF00515]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For designing new battery systems with higher energy density and longer cycle life, it is important to understand the degradation mechanism of the electrode material, especially at the individual particle level. Using in situ transmission X-ray microscopy (TXM) coupled to a pouch cell setup, the inhomogeneous Li distribution as well as the formation, population, and evolution of inactive domains in a single LiCoO2 particle were visualized as it was cycled for many times. It is found that the percentage of the particle that fully recovered to the pristine state is strongly related to the cycling rate. Interestingly, we also observed the evolution of the inactive region within the particle during long-term cycling. The relationship between morphological degradation and chemical inhomogeneity, including the formation of unanticipated Co metal phase, is also observed. Our work highlights the capability of in situ TXM for studying the degradation mechanism of materials in LIBs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据