4.0 Article

Theory and practice of electron diffraction from single atoms and extended objects using an EMPAD

期刊

MICROSCOPY
卷 67, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jmicro/dfx123

关键词

TEM; DPC; COM; pixelated detector; ptychography; 4D STEM

资金

  1. Air Force Office of Scientific Research through the 2D Electronics Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative (MURI) [FA9550-16-1-0031]
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF) through the Platform for the Accelerated Realization, Analysis, and Discovery of Interface Materials (PARADIM) [DMR-1539918]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-10ER46693]
  4. Kavli Institute at Cornell for Nanoscale Science
  5. Cornell Center for Materials Research, through the National Science Foundation MRSEC program [DMR 1719875]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

What does the diffraction pattern from a single atom look like? How does it differ from the scattering from long-range potential? With the development of new high-dynamic range pixel array detectors to measure the complete momentum distribution, these questions have immediate relevance for designing and understanding momentum-resolved imaging modes. We explore the asymptotic limits of long-range and short-range potentials. We use a simple quantum mechanical model to explain the general and asymptotic limits for the probability distribution in both real and reciprocal space. Features in the scattering potential much larger than the probe size cause the bright field (BF) disk to deflect uniformly, while features much smaller than the probe size, instead of a deflection, cause a redistribution of intensity within the BF disk. Because long-range and short-range features are encoded differently in the diffraction pattern, it is possible to separate their contributions in differential phase-contrast (DPC) or center-of-mass (CoM) imaging. The shape profiles for atomic resolution CoM imaging are dominated by the shape of the probe gradient and not the highly singular atomic potentials or their local fields. Instead, only the peak height shows an atomic number sensitivity, whose precise dependence is determined by the convergence angle. At lower convergence angles, the contrast oscillates with increasing atomic number, similar to BF imaging. The range of collection angles impacts DPC and CoM imaging differently, with CoM being more sensitive to the upper cutoff limit, while DPC is more sensitive to the lower cutoff.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据