4.7 Article

Hierarchy based information requirements for sustainable operations of buildings in QatarSergio

期刊

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
卷 32, 期 -, 页码 435-448

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2017.03.005

关键词

Sustainability; KPI; Clients' requirements; Decision support system; Hierarchy based information; Building Information Modellinga

资金

  1. Qatar National Priority Research Program (NPRP) [6-604-2-253]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Information flows in construction projects are generally focused on the needs of the design and construction phases. This creates disruption of workflows across the project stages and in particular with the information hand over to the operation stage. The adherence to the clients' requirements for the operation phase of buildings becomes very challenging. A structured information delivery enabled by BIM protocols, established at the project's inception phase, can help: 1) prevent information loss during the project development; 2) ensure the coordinated delivery of the clients' requirements as stated at the predesign stage, and 3) anticipate the impact of client decisions at early project stages on the operational performance of buildings. This research presents a methodology and a decision support system to help obtaining, categorizing and trading off sustainability and facility management values using subjective driven priorities from top-level management. The decision support system will assist, within digitally enabled projects, in translating these priorities into objective parameters and information categories. These can be subsequently-included within the project tender and bidders' BIM Execution Plans. The tool will also help to monitorthe performance of the project design with the national sustainavility and the client targers as the project progresses. The proposed tool is presented within the context of Qatar but it could be applied in other countries. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据