4.7 Article

Occupancy schedules for energy simulation in new prEN16798-1 and ISO/FDIS 17772-1 standards

期刊

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
卷 35, 期 -, 页码 134-144

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2017.07.010

关键词

Occupant schedule; Lighting schedule; Appliance schedule; Occupant heat emission

资金

  1. K.V. Lindholms Stiftelse foundation
  2. Saatio L.V.Y. foundation
  3. Estonian Centre of Excellence in Zero Energy and Resource Efficient Smart Buildings and Districts, ZEBE - European Regional Development Fund [2014-2020.4.01.15-0016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reports the development of occupancy, lighting and appliance hourly schedules for new energy calculation input data standards. Developed schedules apply for 10 building categories which are described by one to three space categories, and include the separation between weekdays and weekends if needed. The approach used allowed to keep the full set of schedules compact and easy to implement in building energy simulation tools. The average values cab be used in monthly calculation tools. Occupant density values have local nature and occupancy patterns also depend on culture. The structure of the schedules, i.e. the way how the occupancy patterns are described, may be seen as an original result and its application has no geographical limitations. The main focus of the study was in the occupancy heat emission modeling and schedule development for prEN16798-1 and ISO/FDIS 17772-1 standards, supported by appliances and lighting schedules which are similarly needed as energy calculation input data. Hourly schedules allow to model occupant behaviour effects, for instance the peak cooling load in an office room was increased by factor of 1.1-1.3 compared to the use of constant average value. Single office schedule increased the delivered cooling energy by 8% compared to an open plan office schedule. The findings emphasize the importance of realistic schedules for specific categories of buildings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据