4.6 Article

Influence of morphological and chemical features of biochar on hydrogen peroxide activation: implications on sulfamethazine degradation

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 6, 期 77, 页码 73186-73196

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6ra11850j

关键词

-

资金

  1. Program for the National Natural Science Foundation of China [51378190, 51278176, 51408206, 51579098, 51521006]
  2. National Program for Support of Top-Notch Young Professionals of China
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  4. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-13-0186]
  5. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT-13R17]
  6. Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Education Department [521293050]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigated how morphological and chemical features of biochars influenced hydroxyl radical (cOH) generation and sulfamethazine (SMT) degradation in the presence of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). Effects of SMT adsorption on H2O2 activation by biochar were also studied. In this study, a series of wheat chars were pyrolyzed anaerobically at six heat treatment temperatures (HTT) (300, 400, 500, 600, 700, and 800 degrees C) and characterized for morphological and chemical features. Higher-temperature biochar led to the higher yield of cOH formed during H2O2 activation, which might be due to the better morphological features and higher content of basic character biochar obtained at high temperature. The degradation efficiency of SMT (13.7 mM) went up from 93.4% to 100% and the pseudo-first-order rate constant increased from 0.0211 min(-1) to 0.427 min(-1) with the increase of charring temperature in H2O2/biochar system. Furthermore, biochars' reactivity toward H2O2 was inhibited by the adsorption of SMT on their surface. The present findings highlighted the influence of morphological and chemical features of biochar on H2O2 activation, and provided a new approach for biochar application to organic contaminant removal.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据