4.2 Article

Differential IL-1 signaling induced by BMPR2 deficiency drives pulmonary vascular remodeling

期刊

PULMONARY CIRCULATION
卷 7, 期 4, 页码 768-776

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/2045893217729096

关键词

interleukin-1 ss; pulmonary hypertension; inflammation; BMPR-II

资金

  1. British Heart Foundation [FS/13/48/30453, PG/11/116/29288]
  2. Bayer Unrestricted Medical Education Grant
  3. Actelion Pharmaceuticals
  4. Medical Research Council: Alexander M.K. Rothman clinical training fellowship [MR/K002406/1]
  5. National Institutes of Health
  6. NIH
  7. British Heart Foundation [PG/11/116/29288, FS/13/48/30453, RG/13/4/30107] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0514-10086] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bone morphogenetic protein receptor type 2 (BMPR2) mutations are present in patients with heritable and idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Circulating levels of interleukin-1 (IL-1) are raised in patients and animal models. Whether interplay between BMP and IL-1 signaling can explain the local manifestation of PAH in the lung remains unclear. Cell culture, siRNA, and mRNA microarray analysis of RNA isolated from human pulmonary artery (PASMC) and aortic (AoSMC) smooth muscle cells were used. R899X(+/-) BMPR2 transgenic mice fed a Western diet for six weeks were given daily injections of IL-1 ss prior to assessment for PAH and tissue collection. PASMC have reduced inflammatory activation in response to IL-1 ss compared with AoSMCs; however, PASMC with reduced BMPR2 demonstrated an exaggerated response. Mice treated with IL-1 ss had higher white blood cell counts and significantly raised serum protein levels of IL-6 and osteoprotegerin (OPG) plasma levels recapitulating invitro data. Phenotypically, IL-1 ss treated mice demonstrated increased pulmonary vascular remodeling. IL-1 ss induces an exaggerated pulmonary artery specific transcriptomic inflammatory response when BMPR2 signaling is reduced.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据