4.6 Article

Repeatability of circadian behavioural variation revealed in free-ranging marine fish

期刊

ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE
卷 4, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.160791

关键词

acoustic tracking; circadian clocks; behavioural syndrome; chronotypes; hidden Markov models; repeatability

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competiveness [CTM2015-69126-C2-1-R, FJCI-2014-21239]
  2. FPU predoctoral fellowship from the Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sports (MECD) [FPU13/01440]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Repeatable between-individual differences in the behavioural manifestation of underlying circadian rhythms determine chronotypes in humans and terrestrial animals. Here, we have repeatedly measured three circadian behaviours, awakening time, rest onset and rest duration, in the free-ranging pearly razorfish, Xyrithchys novacula, facilitated by acoustic tracking technology and hidden Markov models. In addition, daily travelled distance, a standard measure of daily activity as fish personality trait, was repeatedly assessed using a State-Space Model. We have decomposed the variance of these four behavioural traits using linear mixed models and estimated repeatability scores (R) while controlling for environmental co-variates: year of experimentation, spatial location of the activity, fish size and gender and their interactions. Between-and within-individual variance decomposition revealed significant Rs in all traits suggesting high predictability of individual circadian behavioural variation and the existence of chronotypes. The decomposition of the correlations among chronotypes and the personality trait studied here into between-and within-individual correlations did not reveal any significant correlation at between-individual level. We therefore propose circadian behavioural variation as an independent axis of the fish personality, and the study of chronotypes and their consequences as a novel dimension in understanding within-species fish behavioural diversity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据