4.6 Article

Density-dependent coral recruitment displays divergent responses during distinct early life-history stages

期刊

ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE
卷 4, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.170082

关键词

Allee effect; density-dependence; recovery; recruitment; regulation; resilience

资金

  1. Pilbara Marine Conservation Partnership - Gorgon Barrow Island Net Conservation Benefits Fund
  2. CSIRO Postdoctoral Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Population growth involves demographic bottlenecks that regulate recruitment success during various early life-history stages. The success of each early life-history stage can vary in response to population density, interacting with intrinsic (e. g. behavioural) and environmental (e. g. competition, predation) factors. Here, we used the common reef-building coral Acropora millepora to investigate how density-dependence influences larval survival and settlement in laboratory experiments that isolated intrinsic effects, and post-settlement survival in a field experiment that examined interactions with environmental factors. Larval survival was exceptionally high (greater than 80%) and density-independent from 2.5 to 12 days following spawning. By contrast, there was a weak positive effect of larval density on settlement, driven by gregarious behaviour at the highest density. When larval supply was saturated, settlement was three times higher in crevices compared with exposed microhabitats, but a negative relationship between settler density and post-settlement survival in crevices and density-independent survival on exposed surfaces resulted in similar recruit densities just one month following settlement. Moreover, a negative relationship was found between turf algae and settler survival in crevices, whereas gregarious settlement improved settler survival on exposed surfaces. Overall, our findings reveal divergent responses by coral larvae and newly settled recruits to density-dependent regulation, mediated by intrinsic and environmental interactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据