4.4 Article

INSPIIRED: Quantification and Visualization Tools for Analyzing Integration Site Distributions

期刊

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.omtm.2016.11.003

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council [269037]
  2. French ANRS
  3. Penn Center for AIDS Research [P30 AI 045008]
  4. PennCHOP Microbiome Program
  5. [AI 052845]
  6. [AI 104400]
  7. [AI 082020]
  8. [AI 045008]
  9. [AI 117950]
  10. [HL 113252]
  11. European Research Council (ERC) [269037] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Analysis of sites of newly integrated DNA in cellular genomes is important to several fields, but methods for analyzing and visualizing these datasets are still under development. Here, we describe tools for data analysis and visualization that take as input integration site data from our INSPIIRED pipeline. Paired-end sequencing allows inference of the numbers of transduced cells as well as the distributions of integration sites in target genomes. We present interactive heatmaps that allow comparison of distributions of integration sites to genomic features and that support numerous user-defined statistical tests. To summarize integration site data from human gene therapy samples, we developed a reproducible report format that catalogs sample population structure, longitudinal dynamics, and integration frequency near cancer-associated genes. We also introduce a novel summary statistic, the UC50 (unique cell progenitors contributing the most expanded 50% of progeny cell clones), which provides a single number summarizing possible clonal expansion. Using these tools, we characterize ongoing longitudinal characterization of a patient from the first trial to treat severe combined immunodeficiency- X1 (SCID-X1), showing successful reconstitution for 15 years accompanied by persistence of a cell clone with an integration site near the cancer-associated gene CCND2. Software is available at https://github. com/BushmanLab/ INSPIIRED.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据