4.7 Article

MagAO IMAGING OF LONG-PERIOD OBJECTS (MILO). II. A PUZZLING WHITE DWARF AROUND THE SUN-LIKE STAR HD 11112

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 831, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/0004-637X/831/2/177

关键词

binaries; instrumentation: adaptive optics; stars: individual (HD 11112); techniques: high angular resolution; techniques: radial velocities; white dwarfs

资金

  1. NSERC Canada
  2. Fund FRQ-NT (Quebec)
  3. Space Telescope Science Institute [HST-HF251366.001-A]
  4. NASA [NAS5-26555]
  5. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  6. National Science Foundation
  7. STFC [ST/G002622/1, ST/F007280/1, ST/M001008/1, ST/L001403/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/F007280/1, ST/G002622/1, ST/L001403/1, ST/M001008/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

HD 11112 is an old, Sun-like star that has a long-term radial velocity (RV) trend indicative of a massive companion on a wide orbit. Here we present direct images of the source responsible for the trend using the Magellan Adaptive Optics system. We detect the object (HD 11112B) at a separation of 2 2 (100 au) at multiple wavelengths spanning 0.6-4 mu m. and show that it is most likely a gravitationally bound cool white dwarf. Modeling its spectral energy distribution suggests that its mass is 0.9-1.1M(circle dot), which corresponds to very high eccentricity, near edge-on orbits from a. Markov chain Monte Carlo analysis of the RV and imaging data together. The total age of the white dwarf is > 2 sigma, which is discrepant with that of the primary star under most assumptions. The problem can be resolved if the white dwarf progenitor was initially a double white dwarf binary that then merged into the observed high-mass white dwarf. HD 11112B is a unique and intriguing benchmark object that can be used to calibrate atmospheric and evolutionary models of cool white dwarfs and should thus continue to be monitored by RV and direct imaging over the coming years.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据