4.5 Article

Hybrid Simulations of Positively and Negatively Charged Pickup Ions and Cyclotron Wave Generation at Europa

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS
卷 122, 期 10, 页码 10408-10420

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2017JA024479

关键词

-

资金

  1. LANL Vela Fellowship
  2. STFC Studentship [1429777]
  3. RAS grant
  4. Center for Space and Earth Sciences (CSES) at LANL
  5. Energetic Particle, Composition, and Thermal Plasma (RBSP-ECT) investigation under NASA's [NAS5-01072]
  6. National Aeronautics and Space Administration [NNX16AM98G]
  7. 241 STFC [UCL-MSSL ST/N000722/1]
  8. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/L001683/1, 1429777, ST/N000722/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. UK Space Agency [ST/N002350/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. STFC [ST/N000722/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the vicinity of Europa, Galileo observed bursty Alfven-cyclotron wave power at the gyrofrequencies of a number of species including K+, O-2(+), Na+, and Cl+, indicating the localized pickup of these species. Additional evidence for the presence of chlorine was the occurrence of both left-hand (LH) and right-hand (RH) polarized transverse wave power near the Cl+ gyrofrequency, thought to be due to the pickup of both Cl+ and the easily formed chlorine anion, Cl-. To test this hypothesis, we use one-dimensional hybrid (kinetic ion, massless fluid electron) simulations for both positive and negative pickup ions and self-consistently reproduce the growth of both LH and RH Alfven-cyclotron waves in agreement with linear theory. We show how the simultaneous generation of LH and RH waves can result in nongyrotropic ion distributions and increased wave amplitudes, and how even trace quantities of negative pickup ions are able to generate an observable RH signal. Through comparing simulated and observed wave amplitudes, we are able to place the first constraints on the densities of Chlorine pickup ions in localized regions at Europa.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据