4.7 Article

THE EVOLUTION OF GALAXY NUMBER DENSITY AT z < 8 AND ITS IMPLICATIONS

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 830, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/0004-637X/830/2/83

关键词

galaxies: evolution; galaxies: fundamental parameters; galaxies: general; galaxies: high-redshift; galaxies: luminosity function, mass function; galaxies: structure

资金

  1. Royal Astronomical Society
  2. STFC
  3. Leverhulme Trust
  4. NASA/STScI grant [HST-GO11082]
  5. European Research Council Consolidator Grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The evolution of the number density of galaxies in the universe, and thus also the total number of galaxies, is a fundamental question with implications for a host of astrophysical problems including galaxy evolution and cosmology. However, there has never been a detailed study of this important measurement, nor a clear path to answer it. To address this we use observed galaxy stellar mass functions up to z similar to 8 to determine how the number densities of galaxies change as a function of time and mass limit. We show that the increase in the total number density of galaxies (phi(T)), more massive than M-* = 10(6)Me(circle dot) decreases as phi(T) similar to t(-1), where t is the age of the universe. We further show that this evolution turns over and rather increases with time at higher mass lower limits of M-* > 10(7)M(circle dot). By using the M-* = 10(6) M-circle dot lower limit we further show that the total number of galaxies in the universe up to z = 8 is 2.0(-0.6)(+0.7) x 10(12) (2 trillion), almost a factor of 10 higher than would be seen in an all sky survey at Hubble Ultra-Deep Field depth. We discuss the implications for these results for galaxy evolution, as well as compare our results with the latest models of galaxy formation. These results also reveal that the cosmic background light in the optical and near-infrared likely arise from these unobserved faint galaxies. We also show how these results solve the question of why the sky at night is dark, otherwise known as Olbers' paradox.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据