4.1 Article

THE OCCURRENCE OF SUBCLINICAL HYPERCORTISOLISM AND OSTEOPOROSIS IN PATIENTS WITH INCIDENTALLY DISCOVERED UNILATERAL AND BILATERAL ADRENAL TUMORS

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 35, 期 4, 页码 401-409

出版社

SCIENDO
DOI: 10.1515/jomb-2016-0020

关键词

adrenal incidentaloma; osteoporosis; subclinical hypercortisolism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Adrenal incidentalomas (Al) are clinically silent adrenal masses that are detected incidentally during imaging procedures performed for unrelated diseases. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of sub clinical hypercortisolism (SH) and associated co-morbidities in patients with unilateral Al (UAI) and bilateral Al (BAI). Methods: We evaluated 152 patients, 105 (69.1%) with UAI and 47 (30.9%) with BAI. SH was diagnosed in the presence of serum cortisol levels after 1 mg dexamethasone suppression test (DST) or after 2-day low-dose DST (LDDST) > 50 nmol/L with at least one of the following parameters: midnight serum cortisol > 208 nmol/L, 24-h urinary free cortisol > 245 nmol/24 h, or ACTH < 10 ng/L. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured at lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN). Results: Age, BMI, and waist circumference were comparable, and diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidemia occurred with similar frequency in both groups. The overall prevalence of SH was 20.5% based on post-1 mg DST, and 20.0% based on post-LDDST cortisol levels, and it was more prevalent in BAI than UAI patients (31.1% vs 15.2%, respectively, p=0.026). LS BMD was lower in BAI than in UAI patients (0.96 +/- 0.14 vs 0.87 +/- 0.15, p=0.002). There were no differences in FN BMD. The prevalence of osteoporosis was higher in BAI compared to UAI patients (37.1% vs 15.9%, respectively, p=0.011). Conclusions: Patients with BAI had higher prevalence of SH and osteoporosis than those with UAI. Frequency of other co-morbidities was similar. This may be due to the higher degree of autonomous cortisol secretion or different tissue specific sensitivity to glucocorticoids.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据