4.7 Article

Development of a global gridded Argo data set with Barnes successive corrections

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS
卷 122, 期 2, 页码 866-889

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2016JC012285

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2013CB956603, 2012CB955903, 2012FY112300, 2016YFC1401408]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41306005, 41576018, 41606020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new 11 year (2004-2014) monthly 1 degrees gridded Argo temperature and salinity data set with 49 vertical levels from the surface to 1950 m depth (named BOA-Argo) is generated for use in ocean research and modeling studies. The data set is produced based on refined Barnes successive corrections by adopting flexible response functions based on a series of error analyses to minimize errors induced by nonuniform spatial distribution of Argo observations. These response functions allow BOA-Argo to capture a greater portion of mesoscale and large-scale signals while compressing small-sale and high-frequency noise relative to the most recent version of the World Ocean Atlas (WOA). BOA-Argo data set is evaluated against other gridded data sets, such as WOA13, Roemmich-Argo, Jamestec-Argo, EN4-Argo, and IPRC-Argo in terms of climatology, independent observations, mixed-layer depth, and so on. Generally, BOA-Argo compares well with other Argo gridded data sets. The RMSEs and correlation coefficients of compared variables from BOA-Argo agree most with those from the Roemmich-Argo. In particular, more mesoscale features are retained in BOA-Argo than others as compared to satellite sea surface heights. These results indicate that the BOA-Argo data set is a useful and promising adding to the current Argo data sets. The proposed refined Barnes method is computationally simple and efficient, so that the BOA-Argo data set can be easily updated to keep pace with tremendous daily increases in the volume of Argo temperature and salinity data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据