4.6 Article

Bioinspired Peptide-Decorated Tannic Acid for in Situ Remineralization of Tooth Enamel: In Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation

期刊

ACS BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING
卷 3, 期 12, 页码 3553-3562

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00623

关键词

polyphenol; salivary acquired pellicle; effective adsorption; biomineralization; dental restoration

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51573110]
  2. National Key Research and Development Plan of China [2016YFC1100404]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tooth enamel can be eroded by the local cariogenic bacteria in plaque or nonbacterial factors in the oral environment. The damage is irreversible in most situations. For the etched human tooth enamel to be restored in situ, a salivary-acquired pellicle (SAP) bioinspired tannic acid (SAP-TA) is synthesized. Statherin is one of the SAP proteins that can selectively adsorb onto enamel surface. Peptide sequence DDDEEKC is a bioinspired sequence of statherin and has the adsorption capacity of hydroxyapatite (HAP). TA has abundant polyphenol groups that can grasp Ca2+ in saliva to induce the regeneration of HAP crystal. Hence, SAP-TA not only enhances the binding force at the interface of remineralization but also mimics the biomineralization process of tooth enamel. Moreover, ferric ion can coordinate with SAP-TA to form a compact coating that increases the adsorbed amounts of SAP-TA on tooth enamel. Compared with SAP-TA alone, the etched enamels treated with SAP-TA/Fe(III) have a better remineralization effect and mechanical properties (surface microhardness recovery >80% and binding force of 64.85 N) when being incubated in artificial saliva for 2 weeks. In vivo remineralization performance is evaluated in a classical rat caries model. The polarizing microscope and micro-CT results show that SAP-TA/Fe(III) has a good effect on the remineralization process in a real oral environment, indicating that it is a promising repair material for in situ remineralization of enamel.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据