4.7 Article

Absolute reconstruction of the closing of the Mongol-Okhotsk Ocean in the Mesozoic elucidates the genesis of the slab geometry underneath Eurasia

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH
卷 122, 期 7, 页码 4831-4851

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2017JB014261

关键词

-

资金

  1. 973 research grant [2015CB452602]
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [RGPIN-2014-04183, RES0029444, 386245/2010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the present-day fast seismic velocity anomalies in the mantle requires an accurate kinematic reconstruction of past convergent tectonics. Using the paleomagnetism-based absolute reconstruction method from Wu and Kravchinsky (2014), we present here the restoration of the closing of the Mongol-Okhotsk Ocean (MOO) that existed between Siberia and North China-Amuria (NCA) during the Mesozoic. Three stages, i.e., 250-200 Ma, 200-150 Ma, and 150-120 Ma, are identified from the time-varying convergence rates of Siberia and NCA. The spherical distance between the suture margins was reduced by approximately 66.7% at an average convergence rate of 8.8 +/- 0.6 cm/yr during the first stage at 250-200 Ma, when approximately 62.5-76.1% of the slabs associated with the MOO lithosphere were formed primarily through intraoceanic convergence. In the second stage at 200-150 Ma, the spherical distance was reduced by another 21.1% with a convergence rate of 3.6 +/- 0.3 cm/yr. During this stage, approximately 14.2-30.9% of the MOO slabs were formed and continental-oceanic convergence outpaced intraoceanic subduction. In the last stage at 150-120 Ma, the convergence rate dropped to approximately 0.4-0.6 cm/yr with the formation of approximately 4.6-9.8% slabs associated with the MOO lithosphere. The final closure of the remnant MOO basin could have been accomplished by 130-120 Ma, which explains the origin of the fast-velocity anomalies inside the restored continents at 120 Ma near the suture margins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据