4.7 Article

A Disaster Management-Oriented Path Planning for Mobile Anchor Node-Based Localization in Wireless Sensor Networks

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TETC.2017.2687319

关键词

WSNs; localization; mobile anchor node; path planning; energy efficiency

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61572172]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2016B10714]
  3. Changzhou Sciences and Technology Program [CE20165023, CE20160014]
  4. Six talent peaks project in Jiangsu Province [XYDXXJS-007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The localization of sensor nodes is a significant issue in wireless sensor networks (WSNs) because many applications cannot provide services without geolocation data, especially during disaster management. In recent years, a promising unknown-nodes positioning method has been developed that localizes unknown nodes, employing a GPS-enabled mobile anchor node moving in the network, and broadcasting its location information periodically to assist localization. In contrast to most studies on path planning that assume infinite energy of the mobile anchor node, the anchor node in this study, consumes different amounts of energy during phases of startup, turning, and uniform motion considering the aftermath of disasters. To enable a trade-off between location accuracy and energy consumption, a path-planning algorithm combining a Localization algorithm with a Mobile Anchor node based on Trilateration (LMAT) and SCAN algorithm (SLMAT) is proposed. SLMAT ensures that each unknown node is covered by a regular triangle formed by beacons. Furthermore, the number of corners along the planned path is reduced to save the energy of the mobile anchor node. In addition, a series of experiments have been conducted to evaluate the performance of the SLMAT algorithm. Simulation results indicate that SLMAT outperforms SCAN, LMAT, HILBERT, and Z-curve in terms of localization accuracy and energy consumption.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据