4.6 Article

Cognitive clinico-radiological paradox in early stages of multiple sclerosis

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/acn3.512

关键词

-

资金

  1. Czech Ministry of Education [GA CR 16-03322S, PRVOUK-P26/LF1/4, RVO-VFN64165]
  2. Czech Ministry of Health [GA CR 16-03322S, PRVOUK-P26/LF1/4, RVO-VFN64165]
  3. Novartis
  4. University of Economics, Prague - Internal Grant Agency [44/2017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To investigate whether the strength of the association between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) metrics and cognitive outcomes differs between various multiple sclerosis subpopulations. Methods A total of 1052 patients were included in this large cross-sectional study. Brain MRI (T1 and T2 lesion volume and brain parenchymal fraction) and neuropsychological assessment (Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis and Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test) were performed. Results Weak correlations between cognitive domains and MRI measures were observed in younger patients (age <= 30years; absolute Spearman's rho=0.05-0.21), with short disease duration (<2years; rho=0.01-0.21), low Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] (<= 1.5; rho=0.08-0.18), low T2 lesion volume (lowest quartile; <0.59mL; rho=0.01-0.20), and high brain parenchymal fraction (highest quartile; >86.66; rho=0.01-0.16). Stronger correlations between cognitive domains and MRI measures were observed in older patients (age>50years; rho=0.24-0.50), with longer disease duration (>15years; rho=0.26-0.53), higher EDSS (>= 5.0; rho=0.23-0.39), greater T2 lesion volume (highest quartile; >5.33mL; rho=0.16-0.32), and lower brain parenchymal fraction (lowest quartile; <83.71; rho=0.13-0.46). The majority of these observed results were confirmed by significant interactions (P <= 0.01) using continuous variables. Interpretation The association between structural brain damage and functional cognitive impairment is substantially weaker in multiple sclerosis patients with a low disease burden. Therefore, disease stage should be taken into consideration when interpreting associations between structural and cognitive measures in clinical trials, research studies, and clinical practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据