4.7 Article

Microstructure and mechanical properties of Ni1,5Co1,5CrFeTi0,5 high entropy alloy fabricated by mechanical alloying and spark plasma sintering

期刊

MATERIALS & DESIGN
卷 119, 期 -, 页码 141-150

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.01.036

关键词

Multi principal element alloy; Tensile strength; Fracture; Ductility

资金

  1. Czech Science Foundation [GACR 13-35890S, GACR GB 14-36566G]
  2. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports [NETME CENTRE PLUS - LO1202]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present work is focused on synthesis and mechanical properties evaluation of non-equiatomic Ni1,5Co1,5CrFeTi0,5. ductile single phase high entropy alloy (HEA) with excellent mechanical properties (bend strength R-mb = 2593 MPa, tensile strength R-m = 1384 MPa, tensile elongation to fracture of 4.01%, and elastic modulus of 216 GPa) surpassing those of traditional as-cast HEA. For the alloy production, a combination of mechanical alloying (MA) process in a planetary ball mill and spark plasma sintering (SPS) for powder densification was utilized. The tensile properties of a bulk material produced by a combination of MA + SPS are characterized for the first time. The feedstock powder and corresponding bulk material microstructure, elemental and phase composition, and mechanical properties were investigated by scanning (SEM) and transmission (TEM) electron microscopy, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD), X-ray diffraction (XRD), as well as impulse excitation of vibration, Vickers microhardness and tensile and bend strength tests, respectively. The structure of the samples consisted of single-phase FCC high entropy solid solution of extremely fine-twinned grains and oxide inclusions inherited from the original powder feedstock. Dimple-like morphology corresponding to ductile fracture mode has been observed on the fracture surfaces, with crack initiation sites on the inclusions phases. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据