4.7 Article

Ultrasonic and impact spectroscopy monitoring on internal sulphate attack of cement-based materials

期刊

MATERIALS & DESIGN
卷 125, 期 -, 页码 46-54

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.068

关键词

Sulphate attack; Non-destructive test; Chirp signal; Ultrasonics; Acoustic spectroscopy; Microstructure

资金

  1. Spanish Administration [TEC2011-23403, BIA2014-55311-C2-1-P, BIA2014-55311-C2-2-P]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An exhaustive monitoring of an internal sulphate attack of Portland cement-based materials is addressed. Four series of Portland cement mortars with different amounts of gypsum (0%-2% SO3 respect to the cement by mass) were monitored by means of physical, microstructural and non-destructive tests, studying specimens with a low expansion rate to examine the sensitivity of the applied techniques. The expansion analysis has shown the suitability of a fitting model, allowing the examination of two characteristic parameters: the characteristic time of the expansion reaction and the maximum amplitude of the expansion. In the mechanical analysis, higher values of R-c and R-f were attained as the gypsum content decreased. A microstructural analysis (thermogravimetry and FESEM) supported ettringite formation and expansion process. These results have been correlated with non-destructive tests: impact resonance acoustic spectroscopy and ultrasonic measures. The dynamic modulus and ultrasonic pulse velocity have closely predicted the stiffness of the specimens. The total material attenuation (absorbed energy of the chirp signal ultrasonic wave) presented different trends, showing clear differences for the most damaged series (2% SO3). Attenuation supplied interesting information about the hardening process and the microcracking effect due to a mortar expansion higher than 0.04%. The novelties of this study are the exhaustive monitoring of an internal sulphate attack, as well as the examination of the sensitivity of brand new NDT techniques when this damage process overlaps with the curing process. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据