4.7 Article

Identification of the threshold stress and true activation energy for characterizing the deformation mechanisms during hot working

期刊

MATERIALS & DESIGN
卷 113, 期 -, 页码 27-36

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.10.018

关键词

True activation energy; Aluminum alloy; Constitutive model; Creep; Threshold stress

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51401016, 51401019]
  2. State Key Laboratory for Advanced Metals and Materials of China
  3. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) [2013AA032403]
  4. Constructed Project for Key Laboratory of Beijing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For characterizing the origins of threshold stress and the evolution of deformation mechanisms in hot working region, the hyperbolic-sine constitutive analyses were conducted to determine the threshold stress sigma(0), the true stress exponent n(t) and the true activation energy Q(t) in AA7050 Al alloys. The origins of s0 could be related to the four bypassing mechanisms of dislocations overcoming an obstacle. The origins of s0 are the local climb at 603-633 K, and it may change from the local climb to the detach stress with increasing strains at 663-693 K. The nt and Qt after Young's modulus and threshold stress correction can be associated with the specific deformation mechanism. The deformation mechanisms at peak strains may change from the climb-controlled dislocation creep (lattice diffusion) at 603 K to the Zn diffusion controlled solute drag creep which is controlled by (sub) grain boundary diffusion at 693 K. The nt and Qt decrease with increasing strains may be attributed to the grain boundary self-diffusion accelerated by the fluxes of vacancies for lower temperatures (603-663 K) and the atom diffusion controlled solute drag creep accelerated by the vacancies, (sub) grain boundaries, and the motion of high angle grain boundaries for higher temperatures (663-693 K), respectively. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据