4.7 Article

Experimental and numerical investigation of influence of air-voids on the compressive behaviour of foamed concrete

期刊

MATERIALS & DESIGN
卷 130, 期 -, 页码 103-119

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.05.054

关键词

Foamed concrete; Air-void; Discrete element method (DEM); Strength prediction

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [LP130100884, DP160100775, FT140100408]
  2. Australian Research Council [LP130100884] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A combined experimental and numerical approach is proposed in this study for the characterisation of the mechanical behaviour of foamed geopolymer concretes. Advanced experimental techniques employing X-Ray CT give both microstructures and mechanical responses of a range of geopolymer concretes with varying densities. In parallel with this, a numerical modelling technique based on the discrete element method (DEM) is developed for explicit descriptions of air-void distribution, while the mortar binder is described at the micro/meso scale with cohesive behaviour. The calibrated and validated DEM model is then used to systematically study the effects of air-void content, air-void distribution and microstructural parameters, including particle size and porosity on the compressive strength of foamed concretes. A non-linear relationship between the compressive strength and porosity of foamed concretes is found from DEM simulations, which are consistent with our experimental findings and existing strength-porosity models. Furthermore, it is found that the air-void distribution has a significant influence on the compressive strength of foamed concretes, while the micro-void structure has less effect on the loading bearing capacity of the material. The proposed combined approach demonstrates the tight correlations between experimental and numerical techniques in characterising the mechanical behaviour of foamed concretes for practical design purposes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据